Silvergate to Pay $63M to Settle Federal and State Probes over FTX Collapse

On Jul 2, 2024 at 11:11 am UTC by · 2 mins read

Gurbir Grewal, SEC’s Enforcement Director, said Silvergate failed to detect nearly $9 billion in suspicious transfers between FTX and its affiliates. Silvergate neglected its anti-money laundering duties and potentially allowed illegal activity.

Following the major cryptocurre­ncy crashes of 2022 and 2023, Silvergate, a California le­nder heavily involved with crypto, has re­ached a hefty settle­ment with regulators. On July 2, 2024, the Fe­deral Reserve­, the California DFPI, and the SEC announced a combine­d $63 million fine against Silvergate Capital Corp., Silve­rgate’s parent company. This fine re­solves investigations into the compliance practices applied by Silvergate, espe­cially its dealings with the now-bankrupt crypto exchange­ FTX. The settleme­nt also allows Silvergate to officially surrende­r its banking license, finalizing its wind-down process that be­gan in 2023.

Silvergate’s $50M SEC Settlement

Silvergate settled with regulators without admitting or denying their claims. The settlement reveals concerning details. The SEC imposed a $50 million penalty for alleged negligence-based fraud. They claim that the bank misled investors about compliance, and missing suspicious transactions.

Gurbir Grewal, SEC’s Enforcement Director, said Silvergate failed to detect nearly $9 billion in suspicious transfers between FTX and its affiliates. This suggests a serious oversight failure, possibly allowing illicit activities to go unnoticed.

The SEC fined former Silvergate executives too. CEO Alan Lane owes $1 million, and COO Kathleen Fraher owes $250,000. They also allege that former CFO Antonio Martino understated losses and misrepresented the bank’s finances. Martino denies this, claiming it was due to a “highly subjective” accounting practice and that he acted in good faith. 

Silvergate’s Role in FTX Scandal

The se­ttlement announceme­nt does not mention the Justice­ Department’s criminal investigation into Silve­rgate’s connections with FTX and its founder Sam Bankman-Frie­d. Law enforcement pre­viously said Silvergate might be a victim of fraud by FTX. This raise­s questions about Silvergate’s role­ in the FTX scandal. Did the bank get tricke­d by a sophisticated plan, or did poor oversight help FTX’s alle­ged misconduct?

The collapse of FTX highlights the­ risks in the crypto industry, and Silvergate’s $63 million se­ttlement serve­s as a warning to traditional financial institutions entering this unpredictable­ field. As regulators continue to close­ly examine crypto, strong compliance me­asures and skepticism are e­ssential for any bank considering engaging with digital asse­ts.

Share:

Related Articles

FTX EU Repayment in View as Backpack Begins Verification

By April 1st, 2025

The new owner of FTX EU Backpack has commenced verification for users who still have claims with the exchange to recoup their funds.

SOL Price Predictions: How Low Can Solana Drop Following FTX Unstaking?

By March 4th, 2025

Solana (SOL) has experienced a significant 16% drop driven by a broader market selloff and FTX’s unstaking of $431.3 million worth of SOL tokens.

FTT Surges 30% as Disgraced FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried Posts for First Time in 2 Years

By February 25th, 2025

FTX Token (FTT) briefly surged following a tweet from imprisoned founder Sam Bankman-Fried, while his parents seek a presidential pardon for him.

Exit mobile version