Indian Authority Issues Notice to Binance Demanding $86M in Tax Payment

On Aug 6, 2024 at 9:44 am UTC by · 3 mins read

As this situation develops, other international cryptocurrency exchanges operating in or interacting with Indian users may face similar scrutiny.

Binance, the world’s leading cryptocurrency exchange, has received a show-cause notice from the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) in Ahmedabad, India. As reported by local media outlets, the notice demands a hefty 7.22 billion rupees ($86 million) in Goods and Services Tax (GST), marking a critical move in India’s regulatory oversight of digital currencies.

Focus on OIDAR Services

The DGGI’s notice addresses Binance’s collection of fees from Indian users trading virtual digital assets (VDAs) on its platform. These fees are classified under Online Information Database Access or Retrieval (OIDAR) services, which are governed by specific GST regulations. OIDAR services are conducted over the Internet with minimal human involvement, necessitating adherence to Indian tax laws.

Sources suggest that Binance earned about 40 billion rupees ($476.8 million) from transaction fees, which were routed to Nest Services Limited, a Binance Group company based in Seychelles. The DGGI’s action emphasizes the importance for Binance to comply with GST regulations, considering its substantial revenue and large user base in India.

This latest tax dispute adds to Binance’s ongoing series of regulatory challenges worldwide, reflecting the growing scrutiny faced by the exchange as it navigates complex global compliance issues.

Efforts to Address Compliance

To address this issue, the DGGI contacted Binance’s affiliated companies in Seychelles, the Cayman Islands, and Switzerland. However, these efforts did not yield a response. In reaction, Binance has engaged a local legal representative in India to work with the DGGI and resolve the tax compliance matter.

This notice follows a fine imposed by the Financial Intelligence Unit of India (FIU) earlier this year. The FIU had fined Binance 188.2 million rupees ($2.25 million) for not meeting local anti-money laundering (AML) standards. Despite these challenges, Binance successfully registered as a virtual asset service provider (VASP) in India, signaling its intent to comply with local regulations.

Broader Impact on the Crypto Industry

The DGGI’s move against Binance is part of a wider effort to regulate online services, such as cryptocurrency exchanges and gaming platforms. Under Indian GST law, foreign service providers are required to pay GST for services provided to Indian residents, especially those categorized as OIDAR.

As this situation develops, other international cryptocurrency exchanges operating in or interacting with Indian users may face similar scrutiny. Binance’s case sets a precedent and may influence how other global crypto companies manage their regulatory compliance in India.

While Binance has challenged the allegations, the exchange has stated that it’s cooperating with Indian authorities and remains committed to complying with relevant regulations. The outcome of this case could impact how other cryptocurrency firms approach regulatory requirements in India, shaping the future of compliance in the industry.

Share:

Related Articles

GoPlus Security Token (GPS) Gears Up for Major Binance Launch with Innovative Rewards Program

By March 4th, 2025

Binance will list GoPlus Security (GPS) with HODLer Airdrops, while market activity shows strong interest and rising GPS trading volume.

BNB Chain Scales Network with AI Features While Solana Meme Coins Face Massive Dump

By March 3rd, 2025

BNB Chain is implementing significant upgrades to Binance Smart Chain to handle increasing meme coin activity, including transaction throughput improvements and a $4.4 million liquidity program.

Ronaldinho Meme Coin Soars 36% Despite Blockchain Security Firms Raising Red Flags

By March 3rd, 2025

Football icon Ronaldinho’s new STAR10 cryptocurrency promises exclusive fan experiences, but security experts have identified risks including initial burn functions and suspicious wallet activity.

Exit mobile version